语料库-国产精选一区-提供经典范文,国产精选视频,文案句子,国产精选第一页,常用文书,您的写作得力助手

備考資料:GMAT優秀作文精選(39)

雕龍文庫 分享 時間: 收藏本文

備考資料:GMAT優秀作文精選(39)

  為了方便廣大考生更好的復習,綜合整理了備考資料:GMAT優秀作文精選,以供各位考生考試復習參考,希望對考生復習有所幫助。

  39. The following appeared in an Avia Airlines departmental memorandum.

  On average, 9 out of every 1,000 passengers who traveled on Avia Airlines last year filed a complaint about our baggage-handling procedures. This means that although some 1 percent of our passengers were unhappy with those procedures, the overwhelming majority were quite satisfied with them; thus it would appear that a review of the procedures is not important to our goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avias passengers.

  Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

  The conclusion in this Avia Airlines memorandum is that a review of the airlines baggage-handling procedures will not further its goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avia passengers. The authors line of reasoning is that the great majority of Avia passengers are happy with baggage handling at the airline because only one percent of passengers who traveled on Avia last year filed a complaint about Avias procedures. This argument is problematic in two important respects.

  First, the argument turns on the assumption that the 99 percent of Avia passengers who did not complain were happy with the airlines baggage-handling procedures. However, the author provides no evidence to support this assumption. The fact that, on the average, 9 out of 1000 passengers took the time and effort to formally complain indicates nothing about the experiences or attitudes of the remaining 991. It is possible that many passengers were displeased but too busy to formally complain, while others had no opinion at all. Lacking more complete information about passengers attitudes, we cannot assume that the great majority of passengers who did not complain were happy.

  Secondly, in the absence of information about the number of passengers per flight and about the complaint records of competing airlines, the statistics presented in the memorandum might distort the seriousness of the problem. Given that most modern aircraft carry as many as 300 to 500 passengers, it is possible that Avia received as many as 4 or 5 complaints per flight. The author unfairly trivializes this record. Moreover, the author fails to compare Avias record with those of its competitors. It is possible that a particular competitor received virtually no baggage-handling complaints last year. If so, Avias one percent complaint rate might be significant enough to motivate customers to switch to another airline.

  In conclusion, the author has failed to demonstrate that a review of the baggage-handling procedures at Avia Airlines is not needed to maintain or increase the number of Avias passengers. To strengthen the argument, the author must at the very least provide affirmative evidence that most Avia passengers last year were indeed happy with baggage-handling procedures. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about the numbers of Avia passengers per flight last year and about the baggage-handling records of Avias competitors.

  小編提醒:考生們可在日常生活中多讀范文,多練筆,培養出好的語感和邏輯,這樣才能在考試中寫出優秀的作文。

  

  為了方便廣大考生更好的復習,綜合整理了備考資料:GMAT優秀作文精選,以供各位考生考試復習參考,希望對考生復習有所幫助。

  39. The following appeared in an Avia Airlines departmental memorandum.

  On average, 9 out of every 1,000 passengers who traveled on Avia Airlines last year filed a complaint about our baggage-handling procedures. This means that although some 1 percent of our passengers were unhappy with those procedures, the overwhelming majority were quite satisfied with them; thus it would appear that a review of the procedures is not important to our goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avias passengers.

  Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

  The conclusion in this Avia Airlines memorandum is that a review of the airlines baggage-handling procedures will not further its goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avia passengers. The authors line of reasoning is that the great majority of Avia passengers are happy with baggage handling at the airline because only one percent of passengers who traveled on Avia last year filed a complaint about Avias procedures. This argument is problematic in two important respects.

  First, the argument turns on the assumption that the 99 percent of Avia passengers who did not complain were happy with the airlines baggage-handling procedures. However, the author provides no evidence to support this assumption. The fact that, on the average, 9 out of 1000 passengers took the time and effort to formally complain indicates nothing about the experiences or attitudes of the remaining 991. It is possible that many passengers were displeased but too busy to formally complain, while others had no opinion at all. Lacking more complete information about passengers attitudes, we cannot assume that the great majority of passengers who did not complain were happy.

  Secondly, in the absence of information about the number of passengers per flight and about the complaint records of competing airlines, the statistics presented in the memorandum might distort the seriousness of the problem. Given that most modern aircraft carry as many as 300 to 500 passengers, it is possible that Avia received as many as 4 or 5 complaints per flight. The author unfairly trivializes this record. Moreover, the author fails to compare Avias record with those of its competitors. It is possible that a particular competitor received virtually no baggage-handling complaints last year. If so, Avias one percent complaint rate might be significant enough to motivate customers to switch to another airline.

  In conclusion, the author has failed to demonstrate that a review of the baggage-handling procedures at Avia Airlines is not needed to maintain or increase the number of Avias passengers. To strengthen the argument, the author must at the very least provide affirmative evidence that most Avia passengers last year were indeed happy with baggage-handling procedures. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about the numbers of Avia passengers per flight last year and about the baggage-handling records of Avias competitors.

  小編提醒:考生們可在日常生活中多讀范文,多練筆,培養出好的語感和邏輯,這樣才能在考試中寫出優秀的作文。

  

主站蜘蛛池模板: 冷凝水循环试验箱-冷凝水试验箱-可编程高低温试验箱厂家-上海巨为(www.juweigroup.com) | 不锈钢钢格栅板_热浸锌钢格板_镀锌钢格栅板_钢格栅盖板-格美瑞 | 切铝机-数控切割机-型材切割机-铝型材切割机-【昆山邓氏精密机械有限公司】 | 浙江筋膜枪-按摩仪厂家-制造商-肩颈按摩仪哪家好-温州市合喜电子科技有限公司 | 塑料撕碎机_编织袋撕碎机_废纸撕碎机_生活垃圾撕碎机_废铁破碎机_河南鑫世昌机械制造有限公司 | 瓶盖扭矩测试仪-瓶盖扭力仪-全自动扭矩仪-济南三泉中石单品站 | 煤棒机_增碳剂颗粒机_活性炭颗粒机_木炭粉成型机-巩义市老城振华机械厂 | 农业仪器网 - 中国自动化农业仪器信息交流平台| 北京森语科技有限公司-模型制作专家-展览展示-沙盘模型设计制作-多媒体模型软硬件开发-三维地理信息交互沙盘 | 宿松新闻网 宿松网|宿松在线|宿松门户|安徽宿松(直管县)|宿松新闻综合网站|宿松官方新闻发布 | 同步带轮_同步带_同步轮_iHF合发齿轮厂家-深圳市合发齿轮机械有限公司 | 矿用履带式平板车|探水钻机|气动架柱式钻机|架柱式液压回转钻机|履带式钻机-启睿探水钻机厂家 | 尊享蟹太太美味,大闸蟹礼卡|礼券|礼盒在线预订-蟹太太官网 | 智能家居全屋智能系统多少钱一套-小米全套价格、装修方案 | 英语词典_成语词典_日语词典_法语词典_在线词典网 | 铝板冲孔网,不锈钢冲孔网,圆孔冲孔网板,鳄鱼嘴-鱼眼防滑板,盾构走道板-江拓数控冲孔网厂-河北江拓丝网有限公司 | 广州/东莞小字符喷码机-热转印打码机-喷码机厂家-广州瑞润科技 | 考勤系统_人事考勤管理系统_本地部署BS考勤系统_考勤软件_天时考勤管理专家 | B2B网站_B2B免费发布信息网站_B2B企业贸易平台 - 企资网 | 尾轮组_头轮组_矿用刮板_厢式刮板机_铸石刮板机厂家-双驰机械 | 线材成型机,线材折弯机,线材成型机厂家,贝朗自动化设备有限公司1 | EDLC超级法拉电容器_LIC锂离子超级电容_超级电容模组_软包单体电容电池_轴向薄膜电力电容器_深圳佳名兴电容有限公司_JMX专注中高端品牌电容生产厂家 | 水性绝缘漆_凡立水_绝缘漆树脂_环保绝缘漆-深圳维特利环保材料有限公司 | PO膜_灌浆膜及地膜供应厂家 - 青州市鲁谊塑料厂 | 书法培训-高考书法艺考培训班-山东艺霖书法培训凭实力挺进央美 | 石英砂矿石色选机_履带辣椒色选机_X光异物检测机-合肥幼狮光电科技 | 米顿罗计量泵(科普)——韬铭机械 | Akribis直线电机_直线模组_力矩电机_直线电机平台|雅科贝思Akribis-杭州摩森机电科技有限公司 | 智能型高压核相仪-自动开口闪点测试仪-QJ41A电雷管测试仪|上海妙定 | 成都茶楼装修公司 - 会所设计/KTV装修 - 成都朗煜装饰公司 | 福建自考_福建自学考试网 | 河北凯普威医疗器材有限公司,高档轮椅系列,推车系列,座厕椅系列,协步椅系列,拐扙系列,卫浴系列 | 电车线(用于供电给电车的输电线路)-百科 | 米顿罗计量泵(科普)——韬铭机械 | BHK汞灯-百科|上海熙浩实业有限公司| 创绿家招商加盟网-除甲醛加盟-甲醛治理加盟-室内除甲醛加盟-创绿家招商官网 | 食品无尘净化车间,食品罐装净化车间,净化车间配套风淋室-青岛旭恒洁净技术有限公司 | 西安烟道厂家_排气道厂家_包立管厂家「陕西西安」推荐西安天宇烟道 | 郑州宣传片拍摄-TVC广告片拍摄-微电影短视频制作-河南优柿文化传媒有限公司 | 黄石东方妇产医院_黄石妇科医院哪家好_黄石无痛人流医院 | 粉末包装机,拆包机厂家,价格-上海强牛包装机械设备有限公司 |